One, Two, Buckle My Shoe

I recently read Agatha Christie’s novel One, Two, Buckle My Shoe. It is the nineteenth novel to feature Hercule Poirot and was written during a very turbulent time. Published in November of 1940, it would have been written mostly during World War 2, or entirely if Christie had started it after the publication of Sad Cypress in early 1940.

It has some vivid, if not always pleasant characters, and among other things deals with the kind of revolutionary socialists who are the counterpart to the German ones who started the second world war. Her portrayals of human beings are at times almost painfully realistic and well done. I’m inclined to agree with the reviewer Maurice Richardson, who in his review in 1940 wrote:

The Queen of Crime’s scheming ingenuity has been so much praised that one is sometimes inclined to overlook the lightness of her touch. If Mrs Christie were to write about the murder of a telephone directory by a time-table the story would still be compellingly readable.

Agatha Christie’s style is so simple it might be easy to miss the subtlety of her observation of human nature in its varied forms.

All of that said, there does seem to be a pretty big plot hole in the story, which I find quite surprising because there are usually no plot holes in Agatha Christie’s work, not even small ones. (spoilers follow.)

I can’t see any way that Alistair Blunt could have arranged for a dentist appointment shortly before Mr. Amberiotis’ appointment which was right after Miss Sainsbury Seale’s appointment. And that’s assuming we were to grant the coincidence of the two men having the same dentist as Mabelle Sainsbury Seale, which seems difficult on its face since she was of a different social class than them. Oh, and also the same dentist as “Mrs. Chapman.” (Mabelle and “Mrs. Chapman” had to have the same dentist because the switching of dental records was an important plot point. [See the second update below for more.])

The coincidences are not insurmountable; coincidences do happen and when they merely shape the result rather than make it possible, it’s not disappointing.

But what I can’t for the life of me figure out is how Alistair Blunt (or “Mrs. Chapman”) ever found out about this coincidence. People—especially foreigners who are only visiting—don’t visit the dentist often enough that one would just call around to all of the dentists asking if they had an appointment for the victim. Even if this coincidence was known, how would Alistair Blunt then get an appointment for shortly before Mr. Amberiotis? Requesting it would be far too suspicious. Not to mention that setting up having been patients would take months, at least.

And there’s no way that the entire thing could be coincidence on the day of the murders, since the murders and switching of the dental records were planned ahead of time, as was the fake telegram getting the secretary out of the way.

I can’t help but wonder if there’s something I’m missing, because this is very unlike Agatha Christie.


UPDATE: A reader brought up the timing of Amberiotis’ making an appointment with the dentist. This, I think, was in advance of the day of his murder. I’m going to quote the section in full since it’s short.

At the Savoy Hotel Mr. Amberiotis was picking his teeth with a toothpick and grinning to himself.

Everything was going very nicely.

He had had his usual luck. Fancy those few kind words of his to that idiotic hen of a woman being so richly repaid. Oh! well—cast your bread upon the waters. He had always been a kindhearted man. And generous! In the future he would be able to be even more generous. Benevolent visions floated before his eyes. Little Dimitri… And the good Constantopolus struggling with his little restaurant… What pleasant surprises for them…

The toothpick probed ungaurdedly and Mr. Amberiotis winced. Rosy visions of the future faded and gave way to apprehensions of the immediate future. He explored tenderly with his tongue. He took out his notebook. Twelve o’clock. 58, Queen Charlotte Street.

He tried to recapture his former exultant mood. But in vain. The horizon had shrunk to six bare words.

“58, Queen Charlotte Street. Twelve o’clock.”

While the text is slightly ambiguous, I think the most natural interpretation of these words would be that Mr. Amberiotis already had an appointment with the dentist, which was why upon feeling the pain, he merely looked at his notebook and there was no mention of making a telephone call.

On the other hand, this text also makes it sound like Mr. Amberiotis had just had his conversation with the real Miss Sainsbury Seale but that had to have happened at least a week before, since that was the length of time that “Miss Chapman” pretended to be Miss Sainsbury Seale.

That said, if the goal is to figure out an interpretation of these words that resolves all plot issues, this section must describe Mr. Amberiotis merely considering the anticipated fruit of having been kind to Miss Sainsbury Seale over a week ago, and then suddenly, by poking the sore place in his mouth, recollecting the appointment he made a while ago with the dentist.


UPDATE: In checking up on something, I came across the fact that Mabelle Sainsbury Seale did, by coincidence, have the same dentist as Alistair Blunt and that’s how they met in London. Approximately three months before the murders, Mabelle was coming out of the dentist’s office as Alistair was going into it and she recognized him and said that she used to be a great friend of his wife’s. So that part was a coincidence which shaped how the murder later took place. Moreover, this coincidence was revealed less than halfway into the book. With the dentist of Miss Sainsbury Seale known three months before the murder, “Sylvia Chapman” had time to become a patient of the same dentist. So there’s no plot hole on how Sylvia and Mabelle had the same dentist in order to make the switch of the records possible.

One solution for how Mr. Amberiotis had the same dentist as Blunt and Sainsbury Seale would be what the ITV version of the story starring David Suchet did, which was to have Mabelle recommend her dentist to Mr. Amberiotis. I don’t remember this being in the novel, but neither was there anything which contradicted it.

This still does not explain how they found out about Mr. Amberiotis’ appointment in order for Alistair to get an appointment on the same day. The fake Mabelle’s appointment does not require an explanation since the dentist, himself, said that it was made the day before as an emergency appointment. But how on earth did they know for which day Mr. Amberiotis had an appointment?


Discover more from Chris Lansdown

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “One, Two, Buckle My Shoe

  1. ripples1235's avatar ripples1235

    I am so glad I found this. I just finished the novel and I am troubled by the same question. I think it’s a huge plot hole that’s been overlooked as I can’t find any explanation for it. Mr Blunt and his wife planned the murder of the real miss Sainsbury. They did and Mrs Blunt took her identity and came to a new hotel where she is telling her friend in the first chapter that she had a toothache. All this was done because Mr Blunt and she were planning on going to the dentist for their teeth that day when actually they were there to kill him so there will be no lose ends for the Sainsbury murder they just committed. They wanted the dentist because he could identity the corpse and also wanted to switch the charts so that the successor will simply think that Mrs Albert Chapman had died. Ok that makes sense. Sainsbury was one problem and they came up with this plan for her. But the second problem was Amberiotis who was blackmailing Blunt. He did get the information from Sainsbury but nothing else really is mentioned. On the day of the dentist murder, in the first chapter is mentioned Amberiotis randomly pricking his tooth while thinking about some prospect (getting money from Blunt via blackmail). He got careless and pricked himself hence the sudden visit to the dentist. While it’s odd he chose the same dentist but that can be explained like may be he was the best doctor in that area where Blunt and his first wife lived. It’s mentioned that his first wife lived 5 mins away from Blunt’s house and makes sense that since the real Sainsbury ran into Blunt at the dentist that she was also nearby in that first hotel of hers. She lunched with Amberiotis so the Savoy hotel must be nearby too. But the big QUESTION is how on earth did Blunt and his wife knew of Amberiotis’s visit to the dentist that way. The way it’s written, it was like they had pre planned not only the dentist’s but Amberiotis’s murder too one after the other. It makes no sense. How did they knew? They wanted to kill Amberiotis but they could have come up with some other plan for him. Why on that same day did they manage to kill him too when there is NO WAY find out? If Amberiotis had an ongoing dental issue that he might have mentioned to Sainsbury who later on mentioned it to Mrs Blunt when they met for that tea then it could possibly have been explained but he literally pricked himself that morning when Sainsbury was already dead. I am so upset about this plot hole. Sorry for the long comment.

    Like

  2. Lisa Casey's avatar Lisa Casey

    My trouble with the plot has to do with the buckle of the shoe. Poirot notices the difference in the age of the shoes. But how did “Mrs. Chapman” manage to get the same exact shoe? With the same exact foot of said shoe losing a buckle? That the buckle was sewn on the old shoe is strange, since it was a new shoe Poirot saw that day at the dentist office. Am I missing something?

    Also – I suppose it was Blunt who hired Carter to be gardener, so he could pin the murder of Morley on him…how was that done? And most puzzling of all, why did Gerda call herself Mrs. Chapman? When we find out who the real Chapman is, it makes no sense. Maybe I was too tired when I finished the book, but I’d appreciate someone straightening me out.

    Like

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.