In this video I talk about the problem of ex-hominem arguments, that is, arguments “from the man”. These are arguments in which the person making the argument uses himself (or, more often, some trait of his) as a premise in his argument. The classic example is “I did X as a kid and I turned out all right” but it’s surprisingly common once you watch out for it. It’s not invalid to do, but it does cause some problems when a person does it, namely, that an ad-hominem argument becomes a necessary and valid response. In the example above, if the guy didn’t actually turn out OK, then how he turned out is not proof that the X was fine to do as a kid.
Discover more from Chris Lansdown
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The Latin preposition “ex” requires an object in the ablative case, not the accusative. So it would be “ex homine,” not “ex hominem.”
LikeLike
I know. I know. But if I got it right, far fewer people would get it. 😦
LikeLike